This new world hath been the asylum for the
persecuted lovers of civil and religious liberty from every
part of Europe. Hither have they fled, not from the tender
embraces of the mother, but from the cruelty of the monster; and it
is so far true of England, that the same tyranny which drove the
first emigrants from home, pursues their descendants still.
In this extensive quarter of the globe, we forget the narrow
limits of three hundred and sixty miles (the extent of England) and
carry our friendship on a larger scale; we claim brotherhood with
every European christian, and triumph in the generosity of the
sentiment.
It is pleasant to observe by what regular gradations we surmount
the force of local prejudice, as we enlarge our acquaintance with
the world. A man born in any town in England divided into parishes,
will naturally associate most with his fellow parishioners (because
their interests in many cases will be common) and distinguish him
by the name of neighbour; if he meet him but a few miles
from home, he drops the narrow idea of a street, and salutes him by
the name of townsman; if he travel out of the county, and
meet him in any other, he forgets the minor divisions of street and
town, and calls him countryman; i. e. county-man;
but if in their foreign excursions they should associate in France
or any other part of Europe, their local remembrance would
be enlarged into that of Englishmen. And by a just parity
of reasoning, all Europeans meeting in America, or any other
quarter of the globe, are countrymen; for England,
Holland, Germany, or Sweden, when compared with the whole, stand in
the same places on the larger scale, which the divisions of street,
town, and county do on the smaller ones; distinctions too limited
for continental minds. Not one third of the inhabitants, even of
this province, are of English descent. Wherefore I reprobate the
phrase of parent or mother country applied to England only, as
being false, selfish, narrow and ungenerous.
But admitting, that we were all of English descent, what does it
amount to? Nothing. Britain, being now an open enemy, extinguishes
every other name and title: And to say that reconciliation is our
duty, is truly farcical. The first king of England, of the present
line (William the Conqueror) was a Frenchman, and half the Peers of
England are descendants from the same country; wherefore, by the
same method of reasoning, England ought to be governed by
France.
Much hath been said of the united strength of Britain and the
colonies, that in conjunction they might bid defiance to the world.
But this is mere presumption; the fate of war is uncertain, neither
do the expressions mean any thing; for this continent would never
suffer itself to be drained of inhabitants, to support the British
arms in either Asia, Africa, or Europe.
Besides, what have we to do with setting the world at defiance?
Our plan is commerce, and that, well attended to, will secure us
the peace and friendship of all Europe; because, it is the interest
of all Europe to have America a free port. Her trade will
always be a protection, and her barrenness of gold and silver
secure her from invaders.
I challenge the warmest advocate for reconciliation, to shew, a
single advantage that this continent can reap, by being connected
with Great Britain. I repeat the challenge, not a single advantage
is derived. Our corn will fetch its price in any market in Europe,
and our imported goods must be paid for buy them where we will.
But the injuries and disadvantages we sustain by that
connection, are without number; and our duty to mankind at large,
as well as to ourselves, instruct us to renounce the alliance:
Because, any submission to, or dependance on Great-Britain, tends
directly to involve this continent in European wars and quarrels;
and sets us at variance with nations, who would otherwise seek our
friendship, and against whom, we have neither anger nor complaint.
As Europe is our market for trade, we ought to form no partial
connection with any part of it. It is the true interest of America
to steer clear of European contentions, which she never can do,
while by her dependance on Britain, she is made the make-weight in
the scale on British politics.
Europe is too thickly planted with kingdoms to be long at peace,
and whenever a war breaks out between England and any foreign
power, the trade of America goes to ruin, because of her
connection with Britain. The next war may not turn out like
the last, and should it not, the advocates for reconciliation now
will be wishing for separation then, because, neutrality in that
case, would be a safer convoy than a man of war. Every thing that
is right or natural pleads for separation. The blood of the slain,
the weeping voice of nature cries, 'TIS TIME TO PART. Even the
distance at which the Almighty hath placed England and America, is
a strong and natural proof, that the authority of the one, over the
other, was never the design of Heaven. The time likewise at which
the continent was discovered, adds weight to the argument, and the
manner in which it was peopled encreases the force of it. The
reformation was preceded by the discovery of America, as if the
Almighty graciously meant to open a sanctuary to the persecuted in
future years, when home should afford neither friendship nor
safety.
The authority of Great-Britain over this continent, is a form of
government, which sooner or later must have an end: And a serious
mind can draw no true pleasure by looking forward, under the
painful and positive conviction, that what he calls "the present
constitution" is merely temporary. As parents, we can have no joy,
knowing that this government is not sufficiently lasting
to ensure any thing which we may bequeath to posterity: And by a
plain method of argument, as we are running the next generation
into debt, we ought to do the work of it, otherwise we use them
meanly and pitifully. In order to discover the line of our duty
rightly, we should take our children in our hand, and fix our
station a few years farther into life; that eminence will present a
prospect, which a few present fears and prejudices conceal from our
sight.
Though I would carefully avoid giving unnecessary offence, yet I
am inclined to believe, that all those who espouse the doctrine of
reconciliation, may be included within the following descriptions.
Interested men, who are not to be trusted; weak men, who
cannot see; prejudiced men, whowill not see; and
a certain set of moderate men, who think better of the European
world than it deserves; and this last class, by an ill-judged
deliberation, will be the cause of more calamities to this
continent, than all the other three.
It is the good fortune of many to live distant from the scene of
sorrow; the evil is not sufficiently brought to their
doors to make them feel the precariousness with which all
American property is possessed. But let our imaginations transport
us for a few moments to Boston, that seat of wretchedness will
teach us wisdom, and instruct us for ever to renounce a power in
whom we can have no trust. The inhabitants of that unfortunate
city, who but a few months ago were in ease and affluence, have
now, no other alternative than to stay and starve, or turn out to
beg. Endangered by the fire of their friends if they continue
within the city, and plundered by the soldiery if they leave it. In
their present condition they are prisoners without the hope of
redemption, and in a general attack for their relief, they would be
exposed to the fury of both armies.
Men of passive tempers look somewhat lightly over the offences
of Britain, and, still hoping for the best, are apt to call out,
"Come, come, we shall be friends again, for all this." But
examine the passions and feelings of mankind, Bring the doctrine of
reconciliation to the touchstone of nature, and then tell me,
whether you can hereafter love, honour, and faithfully serve the
power that hath carried fire and sword into your land? If you
cannot do all these, then are you only deceiving yourselves, and by
your delay bringing ruin upon posterity. Your future connection
with Britain, whom you can neither love nor honour, will be forced
and unnatural, and being formed only on the plan of present
convenience, will in a little time fall into a relapse more
wretched than the first. But if you say, you can still pass the
violations over, then I ask, Hath your house been burnt? Hath your
property been destroyed before your face? Are your wife and
children destitute of a bed to lie on, or bread to live on? Have
you lost a parent or a child by their hands, and yourself the
ruined and wretched survivor? If you have not, then are you not a
judge of those who have. But if you have, and still can shake hands
with the murderers, then you are unworthy of the name of husband,
father, friend, or lover, and whatever may be your rank or title in
life, you have the heart of a coward, and the spirit of a
sycophant.
This is not inflaming or exaggerating matters, but trying them
by those feelings and affections which nature justifies, and
without which, we should be incapable of discharging the social
duties of life, or enjoying the felicities of it. I mean not to
exhibit horror for the purpose of provoking revenge, but to awaken
us from fatal and unmanly slumbers, that we may pursue
determinately some fixed object.
1 comment