They gave him sole responsibility for building an entire
neighbourhood. Admittedly, the enterprise was dizzyingly attractive for a man who had dreamed of
nothing his whole life but building something grand, extensive, new, from scratch, his alone to
direct and plan. But had he been more prudent, he would have known the moment was not
propitious. A man in the midst of such hostility would not be granted the peace needed to
create. A prickly Vieru would be put up with as long as he was poor. How could you hurt him? By
attacking his intelligence? His passion for dispute? Lucky enough to possess nothing, how could
he be condemned for compromising, for being afraid, for being cautious? But a Vieru engaged in
something big, a Vieru on the path to realizing a grand project, went from being dangerous to
being vulnerable. Very vulnerable. The day the ex-pamphleteer stepped on the site, his fate was
sealed: there were old scores to settle and slights to be avenged.
And what a show it was! And not just the
newspaper articles, the coffee-shop talk and the anonymous letters to the consortium that had
hired Vieru. He could have defeated all that alone, he who knew about writing, arguing and
declaiming. But there were neighbourhood meetings too, protesting against ‘the disfiguring
of our Capital by irresponsibly ceding the construction of an entire neighbourhood to a
pretentious bungler’.
And then there were questions raised in
Parliament, telegrams to the Minister for the Arts, ‘spontaneous’ demonstrations in
front of City Hall, mass walkouts of workers …
I remember well those enormous placards hanging
from a cart pulled down Calea Victoriei by a donkey who became popular very quickly.
Citizens of Bucharest! Will you tolerate a
newcomer’s risky experiments in your city, in the capital of a united Romania? Will you
permit the sacrifice of the most picturesque corner of the citadel of Bucur?
I didn’t know the master during that
period, and I would have been indifferent to the whole story if I hadn’t had an
instinctual glimmer of sympathy for the man who had drawn such unanimous enmity. I followed the
affair in the papers and was very distressed to one day read that ‘good sense triumphs
at last, architect Mircea Vieru’s contract has been revoked and work at the
Engineers’ Park has halted, to general satisfaction’.
I met him several months later, in autumn.
It was an empty office. His friends had one by
one deserted him, no clients appeared, the summer had passed without any work and winter was
coming with no projects in store. Vieru was writing a pamphlet to ‘set the record
straight’ about the sad affair of the revoked contract. He wrote at night to give us an
overwrought read in the morning, complete with gestures and outbursts. He was at war with the
universe: with the government, with Parliament, with City Hall, with the Liberal Party, with the
Romanian people. When he found a strident phrase, he perked up: ‘I’ll show
them.’ It was hard to say what he was going to demonstrate, or to whom.
One man alone remained always by his side,
sharing his fury and suffering his disappointments: Marin Dronţu. He carried a stick and
had obtained a permit for a gun. What he really wanted was to shoot one of the
‘thugs’ who wrote in the papers against his master, and if he didn’t do it, it
was only because it was hard to know where to start. But there were some suspicious fights at
night, resulting in some bloodied heads, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Dronţu had a
hand in them. And today, when I ask him, he smiles mysteriously. ‘I don’t know, I
didn’t see anything.’
There were also days when Vieru caved in, when
his fever subsided, when he lost his appetite for the fight, when he trudged through the
workshop, when it all looked empty, senseless, worthless, when he despaired of the drawing
boards, when he was tired of arguing, when nobody mattered to him, whether friend or foe.
‘One day we’ll shut up shop,’
he said with indifference, worn out, after ten cups of coffee and hundreds of cigarettes, smoked
nervously down to the filter.
Sometimes Ghiţă Blidaru would come by
and his breezy presence would shake the master from his apathy. They always found something to
fight about, as there were no facts or ideas which these two men, who had known each other so
long, could agree on. The arrival of the professor was always invigorating. When he had left,
the desire for work would return, as would the courage to curse fate and to have faith in
it.
‘Just you wait, I’ll show
them.’
And so he did. In spring, Rice turned up out of
the blue. True, he didn’t look like a gift from heaven, but he had plenty of money and a
pinch of craziness, which was exactly what he needed to get along with Vieru. And now, nearly
six years later, Der Querschnitt is presenting in Berlin the work of the great
architect of Uioara in Prahova.
Last night I stayed up late talking with Marin
Dronţu, drinking a glass of wine and recalling all that had happened.
‘Where are they, the ones who cursed him,
where are they? I’ll eat them alive!’
I think what draws me most to the master is his
wounded pride. I myself had so many personal humiliations to overcome that I find the company of
this man, who has been struck at from every direction, stimulating. He had bursts of mania and
disgust, turning vengefully on everything, like a flame, like a blade. I preserve an old sense
of obligation, an inevitable sympathy, for the isolated or beaten individual.
1 comment