The impossible

means the stone wall! What stone wall? Why, of course, the laws of

nature, the deductions of natural science, mathematics. As soon as they

prove to you, for instance, that you are descended from a monkey, then it

is no use scowling, accept it for a fact. When they prove to you that in

reality one drop of your own fat must be dearer to you than a hundred

thousand of your fellow-creatures, and that this conclusion is the final

solution of all so-called virtues and duties and all such prejudices and

fancies, then you have just to accept it, there is no help for it, for twice

two is a law of mathematics. Just try refuting it.

"Upon my word, they will shout at you, it is no use protesting: it is a

case of twice two makes four! Nature does not ask your permission, she

has nothing to do with your wishes, and whether you like her laws or

dislike them, you are bound to accept her as she is, and consequently all

her conclusions. A wall, you see, is a wall ... and so on, and so on."

Merciful Heavens! but what do I care for the laws of nature and

arithmetic, when, for some reason I dislike those laws and the fact that

twice two makes four? Of course I cannot break through the wall by

battering my head against it if I really have not the strength to knock it

down, but I am not going to be reconciled to it simply because it is a stone

wall and I have not the strength.

As though such a stone wall really were a consolation, and really did

contain some word of conciliation, simply because it is as true as twice

two makes four. Oh, absurdity of absurdities! How much better it is to

understand it all, to recognise it all, all the impossibilities and the stone

wall; not to be reconciled to one of those impossibilities and stone walls if

it disgusts you to be reconciled to it; by the way of the most inevitable,

logical combinations to reach the most revolting conclusions on the

everlasting theme, that even for the stone wall you are yourself somehow

to blame, though again it is as clear as day you are not to blame in the

least, and therefore grinding your teeth in silent impotence to sink into

luxurious inertia, brooding on the fact that there is no one even for you to

feel vindictive against, that you have not, and perhaps never will have, an

object for your spite, that it is a sleight of hand, a bit of juggling, a card-

sharper's trick, that it is simply a mess, no knowing what and no knowing

who, but in spite of all these uncertainties and jugglings, still there is an

ache in you, and the more you do not know, the worse the ache.

IV

"Ha, ha, ha! You will be finding enjoyment in toothache next," you cry,

with a laugh.

"Well, even in toothache there is enjoyment," I answer. I had toothache

for a whole month and I know there is. In that case, of course,

people are not spiteful in silence, but moan; but they are not candid

moans, they are malignant moans, and the malignancy is the whole

point. The enjoyment of the sufferer finds expression in those moans; if

he did not feel enjoyment in them he would not moan. It is a good

example, gentlemen, and I will develop it. Those moans express in the

first place all the aimlessness of your pain, which is so humiliating to

your consciousness; the whole legal system of nature on which you spit

disdainfully, of course, but from which you suffer all the same while she

does not. They express the consciousness that you have no enemy to

punish, but that you have pain; the consciousness that in spite of all

possible Wagenheims you are in complete slavery to your teeth; that if

someone wishes it, your teeth will leave off aching, and if he does not,

they will go on aching another three months; and that finally if you are

still contumacious and still protest, all that is left you for your own

gratification is to thrash yourself or beat your wall with your fist as hard as

you can, and absolutely nothing more. Well, these mortal insults, these

jeers on the part of someone unknown, end at last in an enjoyment which

sometimes reaches the highest degree of voluptuousness. I ask you,

gentlemen, listen sometimes to the moans of an educated man of the

nineteenth century suffering from toothache, on the second or third day

of the attack, when he is beginning to moan, not as he moaned on the

first day, that is, not simply because he has toothache, not just as any

coarse peasant, but as a man affected by progress and European civilisation,

a man who is "divorced from the soil and the national elements," as

they express it now-a-days. His moans become nasty, disgustingly malignant,

and go on for whole days and nights. And of course he knows

himself that he is doing himself no sort of good with his moans; he knows

better than anyone that he is only lacerating and harassing himself and

others for nothing; he knows that even the audience before whom he is

making his efforts, and his whole family, listen to him with loathing, do

not put a ha'porth of faith in him, and inwardly understand that he might

moan differently, more simply, without trills and flourishes, and that he is

only amusing himself like that from ill-humour, from malignancy. Well,

in all these recognitions and disgraces it is that there lies a voluptuous

pleasure. As though he would say: "I am worrying you, I am lacerating

your hearts, I am keeping everyone in the house awake. Well, stay awake

then, you, too, feel every minute that I have toothache. I am not a hero

to you now, as I tried to seem before, but simply a nasty person, an

impostor. Well, so be it, then! I am very glad that you see through me. It

is nasty for you to hear my despicable moans: well, let it be nasty; here I

will let you have a nastier flourish in a minute. ..." You do not

understand even now, gentlemen? No, it seems our development and our

consciousness must go further to understand all the intricacies of this

pleasure. You laugh? Delighted. My jests, gentlemen, are of course in

bad taste, jerky, involved, lacking self-confidence.