He had no more expression than the back of my hand. His clothing was a dirty gray.
Damn you! I said; what do you mean?
Just the same, I was shaking like a leaf in the wind and did not recognize my own voice.
The night-clerk rose, bowed (apologetically) and - well, he was no longer there, and at that moment I felt a hand laid upon my shoulder from behind. Just fancy that if you can! Unspeakably frightened, I turned and saw a portly, kind-faced gentleman, who asked:
What is the matter, my friend?
I was not long in telling him, but before I made an end of it he went pale himself. See here, he said, are you telling the truth?
I had now got myself in hand and terror had given place to indignation. If you dare to doubt it, I said, Ill hammer the life out of you!
No, he replied, dont do that; just sit down till I tell you. This is not a hotel. It used to be; afterward it was a hospital. Now it is unoccupied, awaiting a tenant. The room that you mention was the dead-room - there were always plenty of dead. The fellow that you call the night-clerk used to be that, but later he booked the patients as they were brought in. I dont understand his being here. He has been dead a few weeks.
And who are you? I blurted out.
Oh, I look after the premises. I happened to be passing just now, and seeing a light in here came in to investigate. Let us have a look into that room, he added, lifting the sputtering candle from the desk.
Ill see you at the devil first! said I, bolting out of the door into the street.
Sir, that Breathitt House, in Atlanta, is a beastly place! Dont you stop there.
God forbid! Your account of it certainly does not suggest comfort. By the way, Colonel, when did all that occur?
In September, 1864 - shortly after the siege.
THE THING AT NOLAN
To the south of where the road between Leesville and Hardy, in the State of Missouri, crosses the east fork of May Creek stands an abandoned house. Nobody has lived in it since the summer of 1879, and it is fast going to pieces. For some three years before the date mentioned above, it was occupied by the family of Charles May, from one of whose ancestors the creek near which it stands took its name.
Mr. Mays family consisted of a wife, an adult son and two young girls. The sons name was John - the names of the daughters are unknown to the writer of this sketch.
John May was of a morose and surly disposition, not easily moved to anger, but having an uncommon gift of sullen, implacable hate. His father was quite otherwise; of a sunny, jovial disposition, but with a quick temper like a sudden flame kindled in a wisp of straw, which consumes it in a flash and is no more. He cherished no resentments, and his anger gone, was quick to make overtures for reconciliation. He had a brother living near by who was unlike him in respect of all this, and it was a current witticism in the neighborhood that John had inherited his disposition from his uncle.
One day a misunderstanding arose between father and son, harsh words ensued, and the father struck the son full in the face with his fist. John quietly wiped away the blood that followed the blow, fixed his eyes upon the already penitent offender and said with cold composure, You will die for that.
The words were overheard by two brothers named Jackson, who were approaching the men at the moment; but seeing them engaged in a quarrel they retired, apparently unobserved. Charles May afterward related the unfortunate occurrence to his wife and explained that he had apologized to the son for the hasty blow, but without avail; the young man not only rejected his overtures, but refused to withdraw his terrible threat. Nevertheless, there was no open rupture of relations: John continued living with the family, and things went on very much as before.
One Sunday morning in June, 1879, about two weeks after what has been related, May senior left the house immediately after breakfast, taking a spade. He said he was going to make an excavation at a certain spring in a wood about a mile away, so that the cattle could obtain water. John remained in the house for some hours, variously occupied in shaving himself, writing letters and reading a newspaper. His manner was very nearly what it usually was; perhaps he was a trifle more sullen and surly.
At two oclock he left the house. At five, he returned. For some reason not connected with any interest in his movements, and which is not now recalled, the time of his departure and that of his return were noted by his mother and sisters, as was attested at his trial for murder.
1 comment