The result is an exploration of human possibility as enjoyable as it is rich, and as balanced as it is varied.

The Canterbury Tales is also very much a poem of its time, and the long introduction Chaucer gives us in the General Prologue presents the pilgrims as a convenient cross-section of fourteenth-century English society. Although Chaucer has a knack for providing just the descriptive detail that will individualize each pilgrim, they are almost never identified by anything other than their profession, and they seem, in most ways, to derive their entire world view from the position in society given them by the work they do. They also often (although not always) manifest their personalities in the tales they tell, and the simple plan of the Canterbury Tales, proposed by the proprietor of the Tabard (the Host), is that each pilgrim will entertain his companions by telling two tales on the journey to Canterbury and two on the way back, and whoever is judged to have told the ‘best’ tale (which the Host defines as ‘the most pleasing and informative’) will be treated to a meal by all the other pilgrims. This form, sometimes called a ‘frame-tale’ because it uses one story (the pilgrimage) to frame others (the tales each pilgrim tells), was not invented by Chaucer, but he makes his frame unusually organic and vivid.

The Canterbury Tales collects an enormous variety of narratives (romance, bawdy comedy, beast fable, learned debate, saint’s life, parable, Eastern adventure), and, given Chaucer’s great ambition, and the length of time over which the individual tales were written, it is not surprising that they are of uneven quality. And yet part of their richness is to provide something for almost every kind of reader (it is markedly the case that the poems that were most popular in the centuries after Chaucer are the least popular with students and scholars now). The great majority of the Tales are extraordinary however, by turns elaborately ornamented and elegant in their language, movingly passionate in their sentiment, or precise in the minutiae of their observation and comic timing. At their very best, however, what is most characteristic of Chaucer’s style and language is the tendency for every aspect of its artfulness to melt away, with the result that all that has been elaborately constructed—almost in direct proportion to the care of that construction—appears so natural as to be ‘real’ and so familiar as to be always and simply true.

Chaucer’s Life

Chaucer’s career gave him the support and patronage he needed to write poetry, but it also provided a tour of human variety, since Chaucer himself lived a life of extraordinary social mobility for the Middle Ages. Although his father was wealthy, he was a merchant and no more, but Chaucer—no doubt helped along by his father’s money—moved into aristocratic circles at a very young age. By 17 he is visible in the public record as a pajettus (‘page’) in the household of the son of Edward III. He then moved steadily from court to greater court until, by the age of 27, he is an esquire (that is, of a rank just below a knight) in the court of the king himself. It is usual for biographies of Chaucer to note that the 500 or so public documents that survive with some mention of his activities never once mention that Chaucer was a poet. But the converse is not true, since his poetry was often addressed to public men of great power. And, while Chaucer performed the variety of tasks normal for a courtier (serving in attendance at large functions; ferrying letters and money; taking part in military campaigns), it is clear that he was also particularly successful in the creation of the short and long poems whose recitation was a central court entertainment. Chaucer clearly wanted to be around powerful aristocrats, but much of his success in their company was surely due to the fact that he wrote such pleasing poetry that they liked to have him around too.

Despite the quality of his connections, Chaucer was, essentially, a civil servant. As he suggests in The House of Fame (c. 1380), much of the reading that informed his poetry—and presumably the writing of that poetry as well—occurred late in the evening, after a long day’s work. Although Chaucer had an excellent early literary education, in a day when the majority of people were illiterate, that education also qualified him to read and write in much more utilitarian ways. In trips to Genoa and Florence in 1372 and Lombardy in 1378, Chaucer’s knowledge of Latin (then the international language in the West) was doubtless the qualifying skill for the diplomacy that was his mission. As Controller of Customs from 1374 he was responsible for keeping accurate records of the various payments of the export duty on wool, one of England’s most important tax revenues. As Clerk of the King’s Works from 1389 he would have sent letters in a variety of directions to maintain the king’s properties for which he was responsible. His steady progress through these positions suggests that Chaucer was as able a bureaucrat as he was a poet, but it may be, again, that the two skills were not unrelated. Chaucer’s earliest major poem, The Book of the Duchess (1369), is a daring attempt to console John of Gaunt, one of the most powerful men in England, on the anniversary of his muchbeloved wife’s death. It must have been perfectly judged since Chaucer benefited from Gaunt’s patronage long afterwards. But to collect hefty taxes from men more powerful than yourself, or to bring disappointing or expensive news about building works to your king, required no less expressive precision than writing such a poem, and Chaucer was clearly as good with the tactful approach in the delicate situation as he was with the well-turned phrase.

Chaucer also survived some of the greatest civil and social tumult that medieval England ever saw. The rising of a group of commoners against what they perceived to be an unjust tax in 1381, and their rampage through London, was only the most concentrated moment of violence in a very unstable set of decades which saw a boy ascend the throne in 1377 (Richard II, aged 10), groups of powerful lords attempt to usurp his power by putting his favourites to death (in the ‘Merciless Parliament’ of 1388), and, finally, the deposition of Richard in 1399. Through it all, disagreement and serious in-fighting in London among various factions resulted in the death of at least one writer, Thomas Usk (beheaded in 1388). Chaucer’s skill as a bureaucrat need not have seen him through all of these changes, and it is clear that at certain moments of his career—particularly in the period 1386–9, when he seems to have left London—he was simply prudent enough to move, smartly, out of harm’s way. Chaucer can also be seen using his literary skills to navigate his way through very troubled waters. The poem usually called ‘Chaucer’s Complaint to His Purse’ is a short allegory, written in the dangerous moment just after Richard II’s deposition, in which Chaucer is bold enough to address complaints about his finances to the new king Henry IV. He must have got the timing and the tone just right again, for the annuity Richard had been paying him is paid as usual the following June.

The work Chaucer did to earn his living and the politics he lived through affected what he wrote deeply, but it is the books that Chaucer encountered along the way that shaped his poetry most of all.