To The Countess Of Blessington
You have ask’d for a verse:--the request
In a rhymer ‘twere strange to deny;
But my Hippocrene was but my breast,
And my feelings (its fountain) are dry.
Were I now as I was, I had sung
What Lawrence has painted so well;
But the strain would expire on my tongue,
And the theme is too soft for my shell.
I am ashes where once I was fire,
And the bard in my bosom is dead;
What I loved I now merely admire,
And my heart is as grey as my head.
My life is not dated by years--
There are moments which act as plough;
And there is not a furrow appears
But is deep in my soul as my brow.
Let the young and the brilliant aspire
To sing what I gaze on in vain;
For sorrow has torn from my lyre
The string which was worthy the strain.
On this Day I Complete my Thirty-Sixth Year
‘Tis time the heart should be unmoved,
Since others it hath ceased to move:
Yet, though I cannot be beloved,
Still let me love!
My days are in the yellow leaf;
The flowers and fruits of love are gone;
The worm, the canker, and the grief
Are mine alone!
The fire that on my bosom preys
Is lone as some volcanic isle;
No torch is kindled at its blaze--
A funeral pile.
The hope, the fear, the jealous care,
The exalted portion of the pain
And power of love, I cannot share,
But wear the chain.
But ‘tis not thus--and ‘tis not here--
Such thoughts should shake my soul nor now,
Where glory decks the hero’s bier,
Or binds his brow.
The sword, the banner, and the field,
Glory and Greece, around me see!
The Spartan, borne upon his shield,
Was not more free.
Awake! (not Greece--she is awake!)
Awake, my spirit! Think through whom
Thy life-blood tracks its parent lake,
And then strike home!
Tread those reviving passions down,
Unworthy manhood!--unto thee
Indifferent should the smile or frown
Of beauty be.
If thou regrett’st thy youth, why live?
The land of honourable death
Is here:--up to the field, and give
Away thy breath!
Seek out--less often sought than found--
A soldier’s grave, for thee the best;
Then look around, and choose thy ground,
And take thy rest.
SATIRES
CONTENTS
ENGLISH BARDS, AND SCOTCH REVIEWERS;
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION TO ENGLISH BARDS, AND SCOTCH REVIEWERS.
ENGLISH BARDS AND SCOTCH REVIEWERS.
HINTS FROM HORACE
INTRODUCTION
HINTS FROM HORACE
THE CURSE OF MINERVA.
INTRODUCTION
THE CURSE OF MINERVA.
THE WALTZ
INTRODUCTION
THE WALTZ
TO THE PUBLISHER.
THE WALTZ
THE BLUES
INTRODUCTION
THE BLUES
ECLOGUE THE FIRST.
ECLOGUE THE SECOND.
THE VISION OF JUDGMENT.
INTRODUCTION
PREFACE
THE VISION OF JUDGMENT.
THE AGE OF BRONZE
INTRODUCTION
THE AGE OF BRONZE.
Portrait of Annabella Byron, the poet’s wife
ENGLISH BARDS, AND SCOTCH REVIEWERS;
A SATIRE.
”I had rather be a kitten, and cry, mew!
Than one of these same metre ballad-mongers.”
SHAKESPEARE.
”Such shameless Bards we have; and yet ‘tis true,
There are as mad, abandon’d Critics, too.”
POPE.
PREFACE
All my friends, learned and unlearned, have urged me not to publish this Satire with my name. If I were to be “turned from the career of my humour by quibbles quick, and paper bullets of the brain” I should have complied with their counsel. But I am not to be terrified by abuse, or bullied by reviewers, with or without arms. I can safely say that I have attacked none ‘personally’, who did not commence on the offensive. An Author’s works are public property: he who purchases may judge, and publish his opinion if he pleases; and the Authors I have endeavoured to commemorate may do by me as I have done by them. I dare say they will succeed better in condemning my scribblings, than in mending their own. But my object is not to prove that I can write well, but, if ‘possible’, to make others write better.
As the Poem has met with far more success than I expected, I have endeavoured in this Edition to make some additions and alterations, to render it more worthy of public perusal.
In the First Edition of this Satire, published anonymously, fourteen lines on the subject of Bowles’s Pope were written by, and inserted at the request of, an ingenious friend of mine, who has now in the press a volume of Poetry. In the present Edition they are erased, and some of my own substituted in their stead; my only reason for this being that which I conceive would operate with any other person in the same manner, — a determination not to publish with my name any production, which was not entirely and exclusively my own composition.
With regard to the real talents of many of the poetical persons whose performances are mentioned or alluded to in the following pages, it is presumed by the Author that there can be little difference of opinion in the Public at large; though, like other sectaries, each has his separate tabernacle of proselytes, by whom his abilities are over-rated, his faults overlooked, and his metrical canons received without scruple and without consideration. But the unquestionable possession of considerable genius by several of the writers here censured renders their mental prostitution more to be regretted. Imbecility may be pitied, or, at worst, laughed at and forgotten; perverted powers demand the most decided reprehension. No one can wish more than the Author that some known and able writer had undertaken their exposure; but Mr. Gifford has devoted himself to Massinger, and, in the absence of the regular physician, a country practitioner may, in cases of absolute necessity, be allowed to prescribe his nostrum to prevent the extension of so deplorable an epidemic, provided there be no quackery in his treatment of the malady. A caustic is here offered; as it is to be feared nothing short of actual cautery can recover the numerous patients afflicted with the present prevalent and distressing rabies for rhyming. — As to the’ Edinburgh Reviewers’, it would indeed require an Hercules to crush the Hydra; but if the Author succeeds in merely “bruising one of the heads of the serpent” though his own hand should suffer in the encounter, he will be amply satisfied.
INTRODUCTION TO ENGLISH BARDS, AND SCOTCH REVIEWERS.
The article upon ‘Hours of Idleness’ “which Lord Brougham … after denying it for thirty years, confessed that he had written” (‘Notes from a Diary’, by Sir M. E. Grant Duff, 1897, ii. 189), was published in the ‘Edinburgh Review’ of January, 1808. ‘English Bards, and Scotch Reviewers’ did not appear till March, 1809. The article gave the opportunity for the publication of the satire, but only in part provoked its composition. Years later, Byron had not forgotten its effect on his mind. On April 26, 1821, he wrote to Shelley: “I recollect the effect on me of the Edinburgh on my first poem: it was rage and resistance and redress: but not despondency nor despair.” And on the same date to Murray: “I know by experience that a savage review is hemlock to a sucking author; and the one on me (which produced the ‘English Bards’, etc.) knocked me down, but I got up again,” etc. It must, however, be remembered that Byron had his weapons ready for an attack before he used them in defence. In a letter to Miss Pigot, dated October 26, 1807, he says that “he has written one poem of 380 lines to be published in a few weeks with notes.
1 comment