The Puritan thought his thought higher and his moral
standards better than those of his successors. So they were. He
could not be convinced that moral standards had nothing to do with
it, and that utilitarian morality was good enough for him, as it
was for the graceless. Nature had given to the boy Henry a
character that, in any previous century, would have led him into
the Church; he inherited dogma and a priori thought from the
beginning of time; and he scarcely needed a violent reaction like
anti-slavery politics to sweep him back into Puritanism with a
violence as great as that of a religious war.
Thus far he had nothing to do with it; his education
was chiefly inheritance, and during the next five or six years, his
father alone counted for much. If he were to worry successfully
through life's quicksands, he must depend chiefly on his father's
pilotage; but, for his father, the channel lay clear, while for
himself an unknown ocean lay beyond. His father's business in life
was to get past the dangers of the slave-power, or to fix its
bounds at least. The task done, he might be content to let his sons
pay for the pilotage; and it mattered little to his success whether
they paid it with their lives wasted on battle-fields or in
misdirected energies and lost opportunity. The generation that
lived from 1840 to 1870 could do very well with the old forms of
education; that which had its work to do between 1870 and 1900
needed something quite new.
His father's character was therefore the larger part
of his education, as far as any single person affected it, and for
that reason, if for no other, the son was always a much interested
critic of his father's mind and temper. Long after his death as an
old man of eighty, his sons continued to discuss this subject with
a good deal of difference in their points of view. To his son
Henry, the quality that distinguished his father from all the other
figures in the family group, was that, in his opinion, Charles
Francis Adams possessed the only perfectly balanced mind that ever
existed in the name. For a hundred years, every newspaper scribbler
had, with more or less obvious excuse, derided or abused the older
Adamses for want of judgment. They abused Charles Francis for his
judgment. Naturally they never attempted to assign values to
either; that was the children's affair; but the traits were real.
Charles Francis Adams was singular for mental poise - absence of
self-assertion or self-consciousness - the faculty of standing
apart without seeming aware that he was alone - a balance of mind
and temper that neither challenged nor avoided notice, nor admitted
question of superiority or inferiority, of jealousy, of personal
motives, from any source, even under great pressure. This unusual
poise of judgment and temper, ripened by age, became the more
striking to his son Henry as he learned to measure the mental
faculties themselves, which were in no way exceptional either for
depth or range. Charles Francis Adams's memory was hardly above the
average; his mind was not bold like his grandfather's or restless
like his father's, or imaginative or oratorical - still less
mathematical; but it worked with singular perfection, admirable
self-restraint, and instinctive mastery of form. Within its range
it was a model.
The standards of Boston were high, much affected by
the old clerical self-respect which gave the Unitarian clergy
unusual social charm. Dr. Channing, Mr. Everett, Dr. Frothingham.
Dr. Palfrey, President Walker, R. W. Emerson, and other Boston
ministers of the same school, would have commanded distinction in
any society; but the Adamses had little or no affinity with the
pulpit, and still less with its eccentric offshoots, like Theodore
Parker, or Brook Farm, or the philosophy of Concord. Besides its
clergy, Boston showed a literary group, led by Ticknor, Prescott,
Longfellow, Motley, O. W. Holmes; but Mr. Adams was not one of
them; as a rule they were much too Websterian. Even in science
Boston could claim a certain eminence, especially in medicine, but
Mr. Adams cared very little for science. He stood alone.
1 comment