The Forsyte Saga - Complete
The Project BookishMall.com EBook of The Forsyte Saga, Complete, by John Galsworthy
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project BookishMall.com License included
with this eBook or online at www.BookishMall.com
Title: The Forsyte Saga, Complete
Author: John Galsworthy
Last Updated: March 12, 2009
Release Date: June 14, 2006 [EBook #4397]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ASCII
*** START OF THIS PROJECT BookishMall.com EBOOK THE FORSYTE SAGA, COMPLETE ***
Produced by David Widger
spines (203K)
subscription (12K)
editon (10K)
titlepage1 (38K)
frontis1 (60K)
FORSYTE SAGA
Complete
By John Galsworthy
[ED. NOTE: The spelling conforms to the original: "s's" instead of our
"z's"; and "c's" where we would have "s's"; and "...our" in colour
and flavour; many interesting double consonants; etc.]
Contents
Volumes
THE MAN OF PROPERTY
TO MY WIFE:
I DEDICATE THE FORSYTE SAGA IN ITS ENTIRETY,
BELIEVING IT TO BE OF ALL MY WORKS THE LEAST
UNWORTHY OF ONE WITHOUT WHOSE ENCOURAGEMENT,
SYMPATHY AND CRITICISM I COULD NEVER HAVE
BECOME EVEN SUCH A WRITER AS I AM.
PREFACE:
"The Forsyte Saga" was the title originally destined for that
part of it which is called "The Man of Property"; and to adopt it
for the collected chronicles of the Forsyte family has indulged the
Forsytean tenacity that is in all of us. The word Saga might be
objected to on the ground that it connotes the heroic and that
there is little heroism in these pages. But it is used with a
suitable irony; and, after all, this long tale, though it may deal
with folk in frock coats, furbelows, and a gilt-edged period, is
not devoid of the essential heat of conflict. Discounting for the
gigantic stature and blood-thirstiness of old days, as they have
come down to us in fairy-tale and legend, the folk of the old Sagas
were Forsytes, assuredly, in their possessive instincts, and as
little proof against the inroads of beauty and passion as Swithin,
Soames, or even Young Jolyon. And if heroic figures, in days that
never were, seem to startle out from their surroundings in fashion
unbecoming to a Forsyte of the Victorian era, we may be sure that
tribal instinct was even then the prime force, and that "family"
and the sense of home and property counted as they do to this day,
for all the recent efforts to "talk them out."
So many people have written and claimed that their families were
the originals of the Forsytes that one has been almost encouraged
to believe in the typicality of an imagined species. Manners change
and modes evolve, and "Timothy's on the Bayswater Road" becomes a
nest of the unbelievable in all except essentials; we shall not
look upon its like again, nor perhaps on such a one as James or Old
Jolyon. And yet the figures of Insurance Societies and the
utterances of Judges reassure us daily that our earthly paradise is
still a rich preserve, where the wild raiders, Beauty and Passion,
come stealing in, filching security from beneath our noses. As
surely as a dog will bark at a brass band, so will the essential
Soames in human nature ever rise up uneasily against the
dissolution which hovers round the folds of ownership.
"Let the dead Past bury its dead" would be a better saying if
the Past ever died. The persistence of the Past is one of those
tragi-comic blessings which each new age denies, coming cocksure on
to the stage to mouth its claim to a perfect novelty.
But no Age is so new as that! Human Nature, under its changing
pretensions and clothes, is and ever will be very much of a
Forsyte, and might, after all, be a much worse animal.
Looking back on the Victorian era, whose ripeness, decline, and
'fall-of' is in some sort pictured in "The Forsyte Saga," we see
now that we have but jumped out of a frying-pan into a fire. It
would be difficult to substantiate a claim that the case of England
was better in 1913 than it was in 1886, when the Forsytes assembled
at Old Jolyon's to celebrate the engagement of June to Philip
Bosinney. And in 1920, when again the clan gathered to bless the
marriage of Fleur with Michael Mont, the state of England is as
surely too molten and bankrupt as in the eighties it was too
congealed and low-percented. If these chronicles had been a really
scientific study of transition one would have dwelt probably on
such factors as the invention of bicycle, motor-car, and
flying-machine; the arrival of a cheap Press; the decline of
country life and increase of the towns; the birth of the Cinema.
Men are, in fact, quite unable to control their own inventions;
they at best develop adaptability to the new conditions those
inventions create.
But this long tale is no scientific study of a period; it is
rather an intimate incarnation of the disturbance that Beauty
effects in the lives of men.
The figure of Irene, never, as the reader may possibly have
observed, present, except through the senses of other characters,
is a concretion of disturbing Beauty impinging on a possessive
world.
One has noticed that readers, as they wade on through the salt
waters of the Saga, are inclined more and more to pity Soames, and
to think that in doing so they are in revolt against the mood of
his creator. Far from it! He, too, pities Soames, the tragedy of
whose life is the very simple, uncontrollable tragedy of being
unlovable, without quite a thick enough skin to be thoroughly
unconscious of the fact. Not even Fleur loves Soames as he feels he
ought to be loved. But in pitying Soames, readers incline, perhaps,
to animus against Irene: After all, they think, he wasn't a bad
fellow, it wasn't his fault; she ought to have forgiven him, and so
on!
And, taking sides, they lose perception of the simple truth,
which underlies the whole story, that where sex attraction is
utterly and definitely lacking in one partner to a union, no amount
of pity, or reason, or duty, or what not, can overcome a repulsion
implicit in Nature. Whether it ought to, or no, is beside the
point; because in fact it never does. And where Irene seems hard
and cruel, as in the Bois de Boulogne, or the Goupenor Gallery, she
is but wisely realistic—knowing that the least concession is the
inch which precedes the impossible, the repulsive ell.
A criticism one might pass on the last phase of the Saga is the
complaint that Irene and Jolyon those rebels against property—claim
spiritual property in their son Jon. But it would be
hypercriticism, as the tale is told. No father and mother could
have let the boy marry Fleur without knowledge of the facts; and
the facts determine Jon, not the persuasion of his parents.
Moreover, Jolyon's persuasion is not on his own account, but on
Irene's, and Irene's persuasion becomes a reiterated: "Don't think
of me, think of yourself!" That Jon, knowing the facts, can realise
his mother's feelings, will hardly with justice be held proof that
she is, after all, a Forsyte.
But though the impingement of Beauty and the claims of Freedom
on a possessive world are the main prepossessions of the Forsyte
Saga, it cannot be absolved from the charge of embalming the
upper-middle class. As the old Egyptians placed around their
mummies the necessaries of a future existence, so I have
endeavoured to lay beside the figures of Aunts Ann and Juley and
Hester, of Timothy and Swithin, of Old Jolyon and James, and of
their sons, that which shall guarantee them a little life
here-after, a little balm in the hurried Gilead of a dissolving
"Progress."
If the upper-middle class, with other classes, is destined to
"move on" into amorphism, here, pickled in these pages, it lies
under glass for strollers in the wide and ill-arranged museum of
Letters. Here it rests, preserved in its own juice: The Sense of
Property. 1922.
THE MAN OF PROPERTY
by JOHN GALSWORTHY
"........You will answer
The slaves are ours....."
—Merchant of Venice.
TO EDWARD GARNETT
PART I
CHAPTER I—'AT HOME' AT OLD JOLYON'S
Those privileged to be present at a family festival of the
Forsytes have seen that charming and instructive sight—an upper
middle-class family in full plumage. But whosoever of these
favoured persons has possessed the gift of psychological analysis
(a talent without monetary value and properly ignored by the
Forsytes), has witnessed a spectacle, not only delightful in
itself, but illustrative of an obscure human problem. In plainer
words, he has gleaned from a gathering of this family—no branch of
which had a liking for the other, between no three members of whom
existed anything worthy of the name of sympathy—evidence of that
mysterious concrete tenacity which renders a family so formidable a
unit of society, so clear a reproduction of society in miniature.
He has been admitted to a vision of the dim roads of social
progress, has understood something of patriarchal life, of the
swarmings of savage hordes, of the rise and fall of nations. He is
like one who, having watched a tree grow from its planting—a
paragon of tenacity, insulation, and success, amidst the deaths of
a hundred other plants less fibrous, sappy, and persistent—one day
will see it flourishing with bland, full foliage, in an almost
repugnant prosperity, at the summit of its efflorescence.
On June 15, eighteen eighty-six, about four of the afternoon,
the observer who chanced to be present at the house of old Jolyon
Forsyte in Stanhope Gate, might have seen the highest efflorescence
of the Forsytes.
This was the occasion of an 'at home' to celebrate the
engagement of Miss June Forsyte, old Jolyon's granddaughter, to Mr.
Philip Bosinney.
1 comment