I was young enough not to part with hope too
easily;—the vague idea I had that my turn would come,—that the
ever-circling wheel of Fortune would perchance lift me up some day
as it now crushed me down, kept me just wearily capable of
continuing existence,— though it was merely a continuance and no
more. For about six months I got some reviewing work on a
well-known literary journal. Thirty novels a week were sent to me
to 'criticise,'—I made a habit of glancing hastily at about eight
or ten of them, and writing one column of rattling abuse concerning
these thus casually selected,—the remainder were never noticed at
all. I found that this mode of action was considered 'smart,' and I
managed for a time to please my editor who paid me the munificent
sum of fifteen shillings for my weekly labour. But on one fatal
occasion I happened to change my tactics and warmly praised a work
which my own conscience told me was both original and excellent.
The author of it happened to be an old enemy of the proprietor of
the journal on which I was employed;—my eulogistic review of the
hated individual, unfortunately for me, appeared, with the result
that private spite outweighed public justice and I was immediately
dismissed.
After this I dragged on in
a sufficiently miserable way, doing 'hack work' for the dailies,
and living on promises that never
became realities, till, as I have said, in the early January of the
bitter winter alluded to, I found myself literally penniless and
face to face with starvation, owing a month's rent besides for the
poor lodging I occupied in a back street not far from the British
Museum. I had been out all day trudging from one newspaper office
to another, seeking for work and finding none. Every available post
was filled. I had also tried, unsuccessfully, to dispose of a
manuscript of my own,—a work of fiction which I knew had some
merit, but which all the 'readers' in the publishing offices
appeared to find exceptionally worthless. These 'readers', I
learned, were most of them novelists themselves, who read other
people's productions in their spare moments and passed judgment on
them. I have always failed to see the justice of this arrangement;
to me it seems merely the way to foster mediocrities and suppress
originality. Common sense points out the fact that the novelist
'reader' who has a place to maintain for himself in literature
would naturally rather encourage work that is likely to prove
ephemeral, than that which might possibly take a higher footing
than his own. Be this as it may, and however good or bad the
system, it was entirely prejudicial to me and my literary
offspring. The last publisher I tried was a kindly man who looked
at my shabby clothes and gaunt face with some commiseration.
"I'm sorry," said he,
"very sorry, but my readers are quite unanimous. From what I can
learn, it seems to me you have been too earnest. And also, rather
sarcastic in certain strictures against society. My dear fellow,
that won't do. Never blame society,—it buys books! Now if you could
write a smart love-story, slightly risqui,—even a
little more than risqui for that matter, that is
the sort of thing that suits the present age."
"Pardon me," I interposed
somewhat wearily—"but are you sure you judge the public taste
correctly?"
He smiled a bland smile of
indulgent amusement at what he no doubt considered my ignorance in
putting such a query.
"Of course I am sure,"—he
replied— "It is my business to know the public taste as thoroughly
as I know my own pocket. Understand me,—I don't suggest that you
should write a book on any positively indecent subject,—that can be
safely left to the 'New' woman,"—and he laughed,—" but I assure you
high-class fiction doesn't sell. The critics don't like it to begin
with. What goes down with them and with the public is a bit of
sensational realism told in terse newspaper English. Literary
English,—Addisonian English,—is a mistake.''
"And I am also a mistake I
think," I said with a forced smile.—" At any rate if what you say
be true, I must lay down the pen and try another trade. I am
old-fashioned enough to consider Literature as the highest of all
professions, and I would rather not join in with those who
voluntarily degrade it."
He gave me a quick
side-glance of mingled incredulity and depreciation.
"Well, well!" he finally
observed—"you are a little quixotic. That will wear off. Will you
come on to my club and dine with me?"
I refused this invitation
promptly. I knew the man saw and recognised my wretched plight,—and
pride—false pride if you will—rose up to my rescue. I bade him a
hurried good-day, and started back to my lodging, carrying my
rejected manuscript with me. Arrived there, my landlady met me as I
was about to ascend the stairs and asked me whether I would 'kindly
settle accounts' the next day. She spoke civilly enough, poor soul,
and not without a certain compassionate hesitation in her manner.
Her evident pity for me galled my spirit as much as the publisher's
offer of a dinner had wounded my pride,—and with a perfectly
audacious air of certainty I at once promised her the money at the
time she herself appointed, though I had not the least idea where
or how I should get the required sum. Once past her, and shut in my
own room, I flung my useless manuscript on the floor and myself into a chair, and swore. It
refreshed me to
swear and it seemed
natural,—for though temporarily weakened by lack of food I was not
yet so weak as to shed tears, —and a fierce formidable oath was to
me the same sort of physical relief which I imagine a fit of
weeping may be to an excitable woman.
1 comment