Since
she was of the opinion that he ought to feel flattered by our
invitations, she thought it only right and proper that he should
never come to see us in summer without a basket of peaches or
raspberries from his garden, and that from each of his visits to
Italy he should bring back some photographs of old masters for
me.
It seemed quite natural, therefore, to send to him whenever we
wanted a recipe for some special sauce or for a pineapple salad for
one of our big dinner-parties, to which he himself would not be
invited, not seeming of sufficient importance to be served up to
new friends who might be in our house for the first time. If the
conversation turned upon the Princes of the House of France,
"Gentlemen, you and I will never know, will we, and don't want to,
do we?" my great-aunt would say tartly to Swann, who had, perhaps,
a letter from Twickenham in his pocket; she would make him play
accompaniments and turn over music on evenings when my
grandmother's sister sang; manipulating this creature, so rare and
refined at other times and in other places, with the rough
simplicity of a child who will play with some curio from the
cabinet no more carefully than if it were a penny toy. Certainly
the Swann who was a familiar figure in all the clubs of those days
differed hugely from, the Swann created in my great-aunt's mind
when, of an evening, in our little garden at Combray, after the two
shy peals had sounded from the gate, she would vitalise, by
injecting into it everything she had ever heard about the Swann
family, the vague and unrecognisable shape which began to appear,
with my grandmother in its wake, against a background of shadows,
and could at last be identified by the sound of its voice. But
then, even in the most insignificant details of our daily life,
none of us can be said to constitute a material whole, which is
identical for everyone, and need only be turned up like a page in
an account-book or the record of a will; our social personality is
created by the thoughts of other people. Even the simple act which
we describe as "seeing some one we know" is, to some extent, an
intellectual process. We pack the physical outline of the creature
we see with all the ideas we have already formed about him, and in
the complete picture of him which we compose in our minds those
ideas have certainly the principal place. In the end they come to
fill out so completely the curve of his cheeks, to follow so
exactly the line of his nose, they blend so harmoniously in the
sound of his voice that these seem to be no more than a transparent
envelope, so that each time we see the face or hear the voice it is
our own ideas of him which we recognise and to which we listen. And
so, no doubt, from the Swann they had built up for their own
purposes my family had left out, in their ignorance, a whole crowd
of the details of his daily life in the world of fashion, details
by means of which other people, when they met him, saw all the
Graces enthroned in his face and stopping at the line of his arched
nose as at a natural frontier; but they contrived also to put into
a face from which its distinction had been evicted, a face vacant
and roomy as an untenanted house, to plant in the depths of its
unvalued eyes a lingering sense, uncertain but not unpleasing,
half-memory and half-oblivion, of idle hours spent together after
our weekly dinners, round the card-table or in the garden, during
our companionable country life. Our friend's bodily frame had been
so well lined with this sense, and with various earlier memories of
his family, that their own special Swann had become to my people a
complete and living creature; so that even now I have the feeling
of leaving some one I know for another quite different person when,
going back in memory, I pass from the Swann whom I knew later and
more intimately to this early Swann—this early Swann in whom I can
distinguish the charming mistakes of my childhood, and who,
incidentally, is less like his successor than he is like the other
people I knew at that time, as though one's life were a series of
galleries in which all the portraits of any one period had a marked
family likeness, the same (so to speak) tonality—this early Swann
abounding in leisure, fragrant with the scent of the great
chestnut-tree, of baskets of raspberries and of a sprig of
tarragon.
And yet one day, when my grandmother had gone to ask some favour
of a lady whom she had known at the Sacré Coeur (and with whom,
because of our caste theory, she had not cared to keep up any
degree of intimacy in spite of several common interests), the
Marquise de Villeparisis, of the famous house of Bouillon, this
lady had said to her:
"I think you know M. Swann very well; he is a great friend of my
nephews, the des Laumes."
My grandmother had returned from the call full of praise for the
house, which overlooked some gardens, and in which Mme. de
Villeparisis had advised her to rent a flat; and also for a
repairing tailor and his daughter, who kept a little shop in the
courtyard, into which she had gone to ask them to put a stitch in
her skirt, which she had torn on the staircase. My grandmother had
found these people perfectly charming: the girl, she said, was a
jewel, and the tailor a most distinguished man, the finest she had
ever seen. For in her eyes distinction was a thing wholly
independent of social position. She was in ecstasies over some
answer the tailor had made, saying to Mamma:
"Sévigné would not have said it better!" and, by way of
contrast, of a nephew of Mme. de Villeparisis whom she had met at
the house:
"My dear, he is so common!"
Now, the effect of that remark about Swann had been, not to
raise him in my great-aunt's estimation, but to lower Mme. de
Villeparisis. It appeared that the deference which, on my
grandmother's authority, we owed to Mme. de Villeparisis imposed on
her the reciprocal obligation to do nothing that would render her
less worthy of our regard, and that she had failed in her duty in
becoming aware of Swann's existence and in allowing members of her
family to associate with him. "How should she know Swann? A lady
who, you always made out, was related to Marshal MacMahon!" This
view of Swann's social atmosphere which prevailed in my family
seemed to be confirmed later on by his marriage with a woman of the
worst class, you might almost say a 'fast' woman, whom, to do him
justice, he never attempted to introduce to us, for he continued to
come to us alone, though he came more and more seldom; but from
whom they thought they could establish, on the assumption that he
had found her there, the circle, unknown to them, in which he
ordinarily moved.
But on one occasion my grandfather read in a newspaper that M.
Swann was one of the most faithful attendants at the Sunday
luncheons given by the Duc de X——, whose father and uncle had been
among our most prominent statesmen in the reign of Louis Philippe.
Now my grandfather was curious to learn all the little details
which might help him to take a mental share in the private lives of
men like Mole, the Due Pasquier, or the Duc de Broglie. He was
delighted to find that Swann associated with people who had known
them. My great-aunt, however, interpreted this piece of news in a
sense discreditable to Swann; for anyone who chose his associates
outside the caste in which he had been born and bred, outside his
'proper station,' was condemned to utter degradation in her eyes.
It seemed to her that such a one abdicated all claim to enjoy the
fruits of those friendly relations with people of good position
which prudent parents cultivate and store up for their children's
benefit, for my great-aunt had actually ceased to 'see' the son of
a lawyer we had known because he had married a 'Highness' and had
thereby stepped down—in her eyes—from the respectable position of a
lawyer's son to that of those adventurers, upstart footmen or
stable-boys mostly, to whom we read that queens have sometimes
shewn their favours. She objected, therefore, to my grandfather's
plan of questioning Swann, when next he came to dine with us, about
these people whose friendship with him we had discovered. On the
other hand, my grandmother's two sisters, elderly spinsters who
shared her nobility of character but lacked her intelligence,
declared that they could not conceive what pleasure their
brother-in-law could find in talking about such trifles. They were
ladies of lofty ambition, who for that reason were incapable of
taking the least interest in what might be called the 'pinchbeck'
things of life, even when they had an historic value, or, generally
speaking, in anything that was not directly associated with some
object aesthetically precious. So complete was their negation of
interest in anything which seemed directly or indirectly a part of
our everyday life that their sense of hearing—which had gradually
come to understand its own futility when the tone of the
conversation, at the dinner-table, became frivolous or merely
mundane, without the two old ladies' being able to guide it back to
the topic dear to themselves—would leave its receptive channels
unemployed, so effectively that they were actually becoming
atrophied. So that if my grandfather wished to attract the
attention of the two sisters, he would have to make use of some
such alarm signals as mad-doctors adopt in dealing with their
distracted patients; as by beating several times on a glass with
the blade of a knife, fixing them at the same time with a sharp
word and a compelling glance, violent methods which the said
doctors are apt to bring with them into their everyday life among
the sane, either from force of professional habit or because they
think the whole world a trifle mad.
Their interest grew, however, when, the day before Swann was to
dine with us, and when he had made them a special present of a case
of Asti, my great-aunt, who had in her hand a copy of the
Figaro in which to the name of a picture then on view in a
Corot exhibition were added the words, "from the collection of M.
Charles Swann," asked: "Did you see that Swann is 'mentioned' in
the Figaro?"
"But I have always told you," said my grandmother, "that he had
plenty of taste."
"You would, of course," retorted my great-aunt, "say anything
just to seem different from us." For, knowing that my
grandmother never agreed with her, and not being quite confident
that it was her own opinion which the rest of us invariably
endorsed, she wished to extort from us a wholesale condemnation of
my grandmother's views, against which she hoped to force us into
solidarity with her own.
But we sat silent. My grandmother's sisters having expressed a
desire to mention to Swann this reference to him in the
Figaro, my great-aunt dissuaded them. Whenever she saw in
others an advantage, however trivial, which she herself lacked, she
would persuade herself that it was no advantage at all, but a
drawback, and would pity so as not to have to envy them.
"I don't think that would please him at all; I know very well, I
should hate to see my name printed like that, as large as life, in
the paper, and I shouldn't feel at all flattered if anyone spoke to
me about it."
She did not, however, put any very great pressure upon my
grandmother's sisters, for they, in their horror of vulgarity, had
brought to such a fine art the concealment of a personal allusion
in a wealth of ingenious circumlocution, that it would often pass
unnoticed even by the person to whom it was addressed. As for my
mother, her only thought was of managing to induce my father to
consent to speak to Swann, not of his wife, but of his daughter,
whom he worshipped, and for whose sake it was understood that he
had ultimately made his unfortunate marriage.
"You need only say a word; just ask him how she is. It must be
so very hard for him."
My father, however, was annoyed: "No, no; you have the most
absurd ideas.
1 comment