It must be acknowledged, therefore, that
he was really in love with Grace Crawley; and he declared to
himself, over and over again, that his family had no right to
demand that he should marry a woman with money. The archdeacon's
son by no means despised money. How could he, having come forth as
a bird fledged from such a nest as the rectory at Plumstead
Episcopi? Before he had been brought by his better nature and true
judgment to see that Grace Crawley was the greater woman of the
two, he had nearly submitted himself to the twenty thousand pounds
of Miss Emily Dunstable,—to that, and her good-humour and rosy
freshness combined. But he regarded himself as the well-to-do son
of a very rich father. His only child was amply provided for; and
he felt that, as regarded money, he had a right to do as he
pleased. He felt this with double strength after his father's
threat.
But he had no right to make a marriage by which his family would
be disgraced. Whether he was right or wrong in supposing that he
would disgrace his family were he to marry the daughter of a
convicted thief, it is hardly necessary to discuss here. He told
himself that it would be so,—telling himself also that, by the
stern laws of the world, the son and the daughter must pay for the
offence of the father and the mother. Even among the poor, who
would willingly marry the child of a man who had been hanged? But
he carried the argument beyond this, thinking much of the matter,
and endeavouring to think of it not only justly, but generously. If
the accusation against Crawley were false,—if the man were being
injured by an unjust charge,—even if he, Grantly, could make
himself think that the girl's father had not stolen the money, then
he would dare everything and go on. I do not know that his argument
was good, or that his mind was logical in the matter. He ought to
have felt that his own judgment as to the man's guilt was less
likely to be correct than that of those whose duty it was and would
be to form and to express a judgment on the matter; and as to Grace
herself, she was equally innocent whether her father were guilty or
not guilty. If he were to be debarred from asking her for her hand
by his feelings for her father and mother, he should hardly have
trusted to his own skill in ascertaining the real truth as to the
alleged theft. But he was not logical, and thus, meaning to be
generous, he became unjust.
He found that among those in Silverbridge whom he presumed to be
best informed on such matters, there was a growing opinion that Mr
Crawley had stolen the money. He was intimate with all the Walkers,
and was able to find out that Mrs Walker knew that her husband
believed in the clergyman's guilt. He was by no means alone in his
willingness to accept Mr Walker's opinion as the true opinion.
Silverbridge, generally, was endeavouring to dress itself in Mr
Walker's glass, and to believe as Mr Walker believed. The ladies of
Silverbridge, including the Miss Prettymans, were aware that Mr
Walker had been very kind both to Mr and Mrs Crawley, and argued
from this that Mr Walker must think the man to be innocent. But
Henry Grantly, who did not dare to ask a direct question of the
solicitor, went cunningly to work, and closeted himself with Mrs
Walker,—with Mrs Walker, who knew well of the good fortune which
was hovering over Grace's head and was so nearly settling itself
upon her shoulders. She would have given a finger to be able to
whitewash Mr Crawley in the major's estimation. Nor must it be
supposed that she told the major in plain words that her husband
had convinced himself of the man's guilt. In plain words no
question was asked between them, and in plain words no opinion was
expressed. But there was the look of sorrow in the woman's eye,
there was the absence of reference to her husband's assurance that
the man was innocent, there was the air of settled grief which told
of her own conviction; and the major left her, convinced that Mrs
Walker believed Mr Crawley to be guilty.
Then he went to Barchester; not open-mouthed with inquiry, but
rather with open ears, and it seemed to him that all men in
Barchester were of one mind. There was a county-club in Barchester,
and at this county-club nine men out of ten were talking about Mr
Crawley. It was by no means necessary that a man should ask
questions on the subject. Opinion was expressed so freely that no
such asking was required; and opinion in Barchester,—at any rate in
the county-club,—seemed now to be all of one mind. There had been
every disposition at first to believe Mr Crawley to be innocent. He
had been believed to be innocent, even after he had said wrongly
that the cheque had been paid to him by Mr Soames; but he had since
stated that he had received it from Dean Arabin, and that statement
was also shown to be false. A man who has a cheque changed on his
own behalf is bound at least to show where he got the cheque. Mr
Crawley had not only failed to do this, but had given two false
excuses. Henry Grantly, as he drove home to Silverbridge on the
Sunday afternoon, summed up all the evidence in his own mind, and
brought in a verdict of Guilty against the father of the girl whom
he loved.
On the following morning he walked into Silverbridge and called
at Miss Prettyman's house.
1 comment